Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Spin degrees of freedom in the presence of SU(2) symmetry

SU(2) symmetry entails spin conservation for every correlation function, meaning the total spin of the incoming electrons must equal the total spin of the outgoing electrons. Furthermore, all quantities must be invariant under a global spin flip.

Two-point functions are, as a consequence of spin conservation, diagonal in their spin arguments, Gσ2σ1δσ2,σ1G_{\sigma_2 \sigma_1} \sim \delta_{\sigma_2, \sigma_1}, with σi{,}\sigma_i \in \{\uparrow, \downarrow\}. Invariance under global spin flips then implies that there is only a single independent spin component for two-point functions. Therefore, we drop their spin dependence completely.

For four-point functions, in particular vertices, spin conservation implies Fσ1σ2σ3σ4δσ1+σ3,σ2+σ4F_{\sigma_1\sigma_2\sigma_3\sigma_4} \sim \delta_{\sigma_1+\sigma_3, \sigma_2+\sigma_4}. The non-zero spin components of the vertex are

FσσσσFFσσσσFFσσσσF,\begin{align} F_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} &\equiv F_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ F_{\sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} &\equiv F_{\overline{\uparrow\downarrow}} \\ F_{\sigma\sigma\sigma\sigma} &\equiv F_{\uparrow \uparrow}\, , \end{align}

where σ\overline{\sigma} denotes the spin opposite to σ\sigma.

The three spin components above are furthermore related by the additionally identity

F=F+F,\begin{align} F_{\uparrow \uparrow} = F_{\uparrow \downarrow} + F_{\overline{\uparrow\downarrow}}\, , \end{align}

reducing the number of independent spin components to two.

Depending on the context, it is often useful to work with linear combinations of the spin components defined above. One common choice is the magnetic/density basis, defined as

FmFFFdF+F.\begin{align} F_m &\equiv F_{\uparrow \uparrow} - F_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ F_d &\equiv F_{\uparrow \uparrow} + F_{\uparrow \downarrow}\, . \end{align}

Another common choice is the singlet/triplet basis, defined as

FsFF=2FFFtF+F=F.\begin{align} F_s &\equiv F_{\uparrow \downarrow} - F_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} = 2F_{\uparrow \downarrow} - F_{\uparrow \uparrow} \\ F_t &\equiv F_{\uparrow \downarrow} + F_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} = F_{\uparrow \uparrow}\, . \end{align}

The main reason for introducing these linear combinations is that connections of two four-point vertices via bubbles in the phph or pppp channels, respectively, decouple in these bases. Explicitly, one has

[Aχ0phB]m/d=Am/dχ0phBm/d[Aχ0ppB]s/t=As/tχ0ppBs/t,\begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{m/d} &= A_{m/d} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{m/d} \\ [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{s/t} &= A_{s/t} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{s/t}\, , \end{align}

where AA and BB are arbitrary four-point vertices and χ0ph/pp\chi_0^{ph/pp} are the bubbles in the respective channels (see the section on two-particle channels). In this context, the symbol \bullet denotes the contraction over all remaining internal variables except for the spin indices.

Explicit calculation

In the phph channel, we have [χ0]σ4σ3σ2σ1phδσ2,σ1δσ4,σ3[\chi_0]^{ph}_{\sigma_4 \sigma_3 \sigma_2 \sigma_1} \sim \delta_{\sigma_2, \sigma_1} \delta_{\sigma_4, \sigma_3}, due to the fact that Gσ2σ1δσ2,σ1G_{\sigma_2 \sigma_1} \sim \delta_{\sigma_2, \sigma_1}. Hence, the contraction over spin arguments simplifies to

[Aχ0phB]σ1σ2σ3σ4=σ5,σ6σ7,σ8Aσ5σ2σ3σ6[χ0]σ8σ5σ6σ7phBσ1σ8σ7σ4=σ5,σ6Aσ5σ2σ3σ6χ0phBσ1σ5σ6σ4.\begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\sigma_1 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 \sigma_4} &= \sum_{\substack{\sigma_5, \sigma_6 \\ \sigma_7, \sigma_8}} A_{\sigma_5 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 \sigma_6} \bullet [\chi_0]^{ph}_{\sigma_8 \sigma_5 \sigma_6 \sigma_7} \bullet B_{\sigma_1 \sigma_8 \sigma_7 \sigma_4} \\ &= \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma_5 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma_1 \sigma_5 \sigma_6 \sigma_4}\, . \end{align}

For the \uparrow \uparrow and \uparrow\downarrow components, it follows that

[Aχ0phB]=[Aχ0phB]σσσσ=σ5,σ6Aσ5σσσ6χ0phBσσ5σ6σ=Aσσσσχ0phBσσσσ+Aσσσσχ0phBσσσσ=Aχ0phB+Aχ0phB[Aχ0phB]=[Aχ0phB]σσσσ=σ5,σ6Aσ5σσσ6χ0phBσσ5σ6σ=Aσσσσχ0phBσσσσ+Aσσσσχ0phBσσσσ=Aχ0phB+Aχ0phB.\begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\uparrow \uparrow} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\sigma\sigma\sigma\sigma} = \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma_5 \sigma \sigma \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma \sigma_5 \sigma_6 \sigma} \\ &= A_{\sigma\sigma\sigma\sigma} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma\sigma\sigma\sigma} + A_{\overline{\sigma} \sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma}} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \\ &= A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \uparrow} + A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ & \\ [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\uparrow \downarrow} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} = \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma_5 \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma \sigma_5 \sigma_6 \sigma} \\ &= A_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma} + A_{\overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \\ &= A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \uparrow} + A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow}\, . \end{align}

We thus find for the magnetic and density components

[Aχ0phB]m/d=[Aχ0phB][Aχ0phB]=Aχ0phB+Aχ0phBAχ0phBAχ0phB=(AA)χ0ph(BB)=Am/dχ0phBm/d. \begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{m/d} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\uparrow \uparrow} \mp [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ &= A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \uparrow} + A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} \mp A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \uparrow} \mp A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ &= (A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \mp A_{\uparrow \downarrow}) \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet (B_{\uparrow \uparrow} \mp B_{\uparrow \downarrow}) \\ &= A_{m/d} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{m/d}\, . \ \checkmark \end{align}

In the pppp channel, we have [χ0]σ4σ3σ2σ1ppδσ4,σ1δσ2,σ3[\chi_0]^{pp}_{\sigma_4 \sigma_3 \sigma_2 \sigma_1} \sim \delta_{\sigma_4, \sigma_1} \delta_{\sigma_2, \sigma_3}, again due to the fact that Gσ2σ1δσ2,σ1G_{\sigma_2 \sigma_1} \sim \delta_{\sigma_2, \sigma_1}. Hence, the contraction over spin arguments simplifies to

[Aχ0phB]σ1σ2σ3σ4=σ5,σ6σ7,σ8Aσ1σ5σ3σ6[χ0]σ6σ8σ5σ7phBσ7σ2σ8σ4=σ5,σ6Aσ1σ5σ3σ6χ0phBσ6σ2σ5σ4.\begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{ph} \circ B]_{\sigma_1 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 \sigma_4} &= \sum_{\substack{\sigma_5, \sigma_6 \\ \sigma_7, \sigma_8}} A_{\sigma_1 \sigma_5 \sigma_3 \sigma_6} \bullet [\chi_0]^{ph}_{\sigma_6 \sigma_8 \sigma_5 \sigma_7} \bullet B_{\sigma_7 \sigma_2 \sigma_8 \sigma_4} \\ &= \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma_1 \sigma_5 \sigma_3 \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{ph} \bullet B_{\sigma_6 \sigma_2 \sigma_5 \sigma_4}\, . \end{align}

For the \uparrow \uparrow component, which is the same as the triplet component, this equation is already diagonal,

[Aχ0ppB]t=[Aχ0ppB]=[Aχ0ppB]σσσσ=σ5,σ6Aσσ5σσ6χ0ppBσ6σσ5σ=Aσσσσχ0ppBσσσσ=Aχ0ppB=Atχ0ppBt. \begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{t} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\uparrow \uparrow} = [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma} = \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma \sigma_5 \sigma \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma_6 \sigma \sigma_5 \sigma} \\ &= A_{\sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma \sigma \sigma \sigma} = A_{\uparrow \uparrow} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\uparrow \uparrow} = A_{t} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{t}\, .\ \checkmark \end{align}

For the \uparrow \downarrow and \overline{\uparrow \downarrow} components, we have,

[Aχ0ppB]=[Aχ0ppB]σσσσ=σ5,σ6Aσσ5σσ6χ0ppBσ6σσ5σ=Aσσσσχ0ppBσσσσ+Aσσσσχ0ppBσσσσ=Aχ0ppB+Aχ0ppB[Aχ0ppB]=[Aχ0ppB]σσσσ=σ5,σ6Aσσ5σσ6χ0ppBσ6σσ5σ=Aσσσσχ0ppBσσσσ+Aσσσσχ0ppBσσσσ=Aχ0ppB+Aχ0ppB.\begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\uparrow \downarrow} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} = \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma \sigma_5 \overline{\sigma} \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma_6 \overline{\sigma} \sigma_5 \sigma} \\ &= A_{\sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma \sigma} + A_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \\ &= A_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} + A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ & \\ [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} = \sum_{\sigma_5, \sigma_6} A_{\sigma \sigma_5 \overline{\sigma} \sigma_6} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma_6 \sigma \sigma_5 \overline{\sigma}} \\ &= A_{\sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma} \sigma} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} + A_{\sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma} \overline{\sigma}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\sigma} \sigma \sigma \overline{\sigma}} \\ &= A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} + A_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow}\, . \end{align}

For the singlet component, we thus find

[Aχ0ppB]s=[Aχ0ppB][Aχ0ppB]=Aχ0ppB+Aχ0ppBAχ0ppBAχ0ppB=(AA)χ0pp(BB)=Asχ0ppBs. \begin{align} [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{s} &= [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\uparrow \downarrow} - [A \circ \chi_0^{pp} \circ B]_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} \\ &= A_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} + A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} - A_{\uparrow \downarrow} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} - A_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{\uparrow \downarrow} \\ &= (A_{\uparrow \downarrow} - A_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}}) \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet (B_{\uparrow \downarrow} - B_{\overline{\uparrow \downarrow}}) \\ &= A_{s} \bullet \chi_0^{pp} \bullet B_{s}\, . \ \checkmark \end{align}